Dr Mel Siff vs Paul Chek – Back Strong and Beltless Part 2
Author: Dr Mel Siff Blog // Category: Dr Siff On All Things core, Dr Siff on Injuries/Disease, Dr Siff on Resistance TrainingHere’s the critique of Part II of Paul Chek’s Back Strong and Beltless
< http://www.t-mag.com/html/body_122back.html >
PART 2
<<Lahad et al concluded that sufficient evidence was unavailable to recommend
the use of mechanical back supports for the prevention of back pain. In
another study conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health, prophylactic use of back belts for healthy workers was not
recommended because of a lack of scientific evidence promoting their
benefit. There are also many other studies indicating belt use provides no
significant improvement in performance or reduction in the user’s chance of
injury. >>
***Virtually all of the studies that Chek quotes to condemn the use of a belt
are drawn from the world of manual labour or research studies with average Read more…